From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loadingoverhaul.
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:53:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091221195331.GH21163@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC6A97BF1FCC4FC3B2B6478ACE2C9F64@FSCPC>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 08:39:03PM +0100, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >On 12/21/2009 12:24 PM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
> >>As stated before i don't like the idea of automagically
> >>upgrading the firmware
> >>on reset, e.g. after a live migration to a newer qemu version.
> >>You have explained
> >>that qemu-kvm needs this in order to work with live migration
> >>and changed hw
> >>support because of bug fixes. Is this only needed in the kvm case?
> >
> >It's not "needed", it's desired. The same case can be made for
> >real hardware (automated firmware updates).
>
> Tho on real hardware those updates are initiated by someone and not
> automagic.
>
Because on real hardware it is impossible to do it differently may be?
My cable TV provider upgrades FW on my set-top-box automatically.
> >>Does any OS (Windows?) depend on the tables the bios creates
> >>(e.g. smbios)
> >>for licensing? It would be ugly if Windows wants you to
> >>re-activate after a reboot
> >>following a migration to newer qemu version and therefore
> >>possibly changed tables
> >>due to newer bios.
> >
> >Yes, and this is a good point. ACPI table changes can absolutely
> >cause re-activation. If we migrate from 0.12 -> 0.13 and make
> >major changes to the ACPI tables in 0.13, then it's very likely
> >that will result in problems for Windows guests.
>
> Another problem could be on guest resume from S3 after migration if the
> bios or acpi tables change.
On resume from S3 BIOS doesn't recreate ACPI tables. ACPI tables are not
part of a BIOS image and in fact OS can reuse memory ACPI tables reside
in. So such problem definitely does not exist.
>
> >I really think that we need to snapshot the FW and store it with
> >the guest state. If we switch all FW to be allocated with
> >qemu_ram_alloc() and we use an id mechanism, then this will Just
> >Work for savevm based snapshots and live migration. However, for
> >it to work with -M pc-0.11 started from a cold boot, we need an
> >nvram file. We probably want to make available versioned nvram
> >files from each release too.
>
> So the idea is to store the bios/option roms in the guest state and read them
> from there on reset or power cycle?
>
> - Sebastian
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-21 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 11:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loading overhaul Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] Support PCI based option rom loading Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-19 10:57 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-20 15:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 17:02 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-20 17:18 ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-20 17:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 18:01 ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-20 18:24 ` Andreas Färber
2009-12-20 18:53 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-20 21:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-20 21:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] pci romfiles: add property, add default to PCIDeviceInfo Gerd Hoffmann
2010-01-11 21:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] New naming rules for GPXE romfiles Stefan Weil
2010-01-11 21:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-12 10:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] fw_cfg: make calls typesafe Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] fw_cfg: add API for file transfer Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-19 12:06 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-20 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] " Gleb Natapov
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] roms: use new fw_cfg file xfer support Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-20 8:45 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] " Gleb Natapov
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] roms: remove option rom packing logic Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] updated seabios binary for testing convinience Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 11:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] debug: enable bios messages Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loading overhaul Anthony Liguori
2009-12-18 16:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 16:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-18 17:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 17:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-19 1:48 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-12-19 3:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-18 17:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-18 18:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-18 19:41 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-18 19:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-18 20:10 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-20 8:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-20 14:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 14:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-20 14:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 15:07 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-20 15:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 15:20 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-20 15:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 15:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-22 13:04 ` Paul Brook
2009-12-22 13:09 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-22 15:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-22 15:54 ` Paul Brook
2009-12-22 16:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 15:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-20 15:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 15:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-20 15:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-20 15:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-20 16:08 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-20 16:15 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-20 16:23 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-20 17:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 1:59 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-12-21 7:32 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 16:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 16:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 17:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 17:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 18:24 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loadingoverhaul Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-21 18:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 19:28 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-21 19:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 19:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 19:39 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-21 19:53 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2009-12-21 20:16 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-22 7:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-22 14:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 19:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loading overhaul Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 19:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 23:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-22 20:50 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loadingoverhaul Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-21 7:40 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loading overhaul Gleb Natapov
2009-12-21 17:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-01-12 4:48 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091221195331.GH21163@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=herbszt@gmx.de \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).