From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36736D65C58 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBUnL-0006Y3-3p; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 03:01:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBUnI-0006Xc-6m; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 03:01:36 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBUnE-0001tX-PI; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 03:01:35 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XpsxY5RdJz6K9Ff; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 15:59:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D23140B55; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:01:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:01:29 +0100 Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.71]) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.71]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:01:29 +0100 To: Mostafa Saleh CC: "qemu-arm@nongnu.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "eric.auger@redhat.com" , "peter.maydell@linaro.org" , "jgg@nvidia.com" , "nicolinc@nvidia.com" , "ddutile@redhat.com" , Linuxarm , "Wangzhou (B)" , jiangkunkun , Jonathan Cameron , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/5] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user-creatable nested SMMUv3 Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH 0/5] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user-creatable nested SMMUv3 Thread-Index: AQHbMeB0+Q5BEZc9JkeH/U6Jz+dF4rK1Wk4AgAEXftA= Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:01:28 +0000 Message-ID: <200df57473694689a914e16f3db8db59@huawei.com> References: <20241108125242.60136-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.203.177.241] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -48 X-Spam_score: -4.9 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.738, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Hi Mostafa, > -----Original Message----- > From: Mostafa Saleh > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 4:17 PM > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; > eric.auger@redhat.com; peter.maydell@linaro.org; jgg@nvidia.com; > nicolinc@nvidia.com; ddutile@redhat.com; Linuxarm > ; Wangzhou (B) ; > jiangkunkun ; Jonathan Cameron > ; zhangfei.gao@linaro.org > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user-creatable > nested SMMUv3 >=20 > Hi Shameer, >=20 > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 12:52:37PM +0000, Shameer Kolothum via wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series adds initial support for a user-creatable "arm-smmuv3-neste= d" > > device to Qemu. At present the Qemu ARM SMMUv3 emulation is per > machine > > and cannot support multiple SMMUv3s. > > >=20 > I had a quick look at the SMMUv3 files, as now SMMUv3 supports nested > translation emulation, would it make sense to rename this? As AFAIU, > this is about virt (stage-1) SMMUv3 that is emulated to a guest. > Including vSMMU or virt would help distinguish the code, as now > some new function as smmu_nested_realize() looks confusing. Yes. I have noticed that. We need to call it something else to avoid the=20 confusion. Not sure including "virt" is a good idea as it may indicate virt machine. Probably "acc" as Nicolin suggested to indicate hw accelerated.=20 I will think about a better one. Open to suggestions. Thanks, Shameer