From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSF5s-0007ko-8K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:29:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSF5n-0007ex-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:29:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60356 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSF5m-0007e3-VU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:29:23 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:35578) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSF5l-0003pP-I2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:29:22 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NS8FZ-0000O7-AS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:11:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:07:44 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20100105120744.GE22827@redhat.com> References: <1261382970-23251-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1261382970-23251-12-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4B424E95.4040806@codemonkey.ws> <20100104200116.GB21311@redhat.com> <4B427FA5.40701@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B427FA5.40701@codemonkey.ws> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/19] use a bottom half to run timers List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori , av1474@comtv.ru Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:54:13PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/04/2010 02:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:24:53PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> On 12/21/2009 02:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>>> Make the timer subsystem register its own bottom half instead of >>>> placing the bottom half code in the heart of the main loop. To >>>> test if an alarm timer is pending, just check if the bottom half is >>>> scheduled. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >>>> >>> I'm not a huge fan of this for a couple reasons. The first is that it >>> introduces a subtle semantic change. Previously, timers always ran >>> before bottom halves whereas after this change, timers may run after >>> some bottoms halves but before others. While this should be okay in >>> principle, in practice, I'm sure it'll introduce regressions. I'd be >>> very surprised if cris wasn't affected by this. >>> >>> But more importantly, I think timer dispatch needs to be part of the >>> select loop. malc has a git tree that replaces host alarm timers with >>> select() timeouts. >>> >> Where is that tree? >> > > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/malc.git mtloop Don't seem to see anything there. malc? >> IMO we need that, I am not sure all code is as signal-safe >> as it should be. At least crashes that I saw with winxp install >> seem to be related to signal handling. >> > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori