From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Naphtali Sprei <nsprei@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Added 'access' option to -drive flag
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 00:19:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100106001950.GA25683@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B42543C.4060506@codemonkey.ws>
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 12/24/2009 03:09 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >Naphtali Sprei<nsprei@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> >>Added 'access' option to -drive flag
> >>
> >>The new option is: access=[rw|ro|auto]
> >>rw: open the drive's file with Read and Write permission, don't continue
> >>if failed
> >>ro: open the file only with Read permission
> >>auto: open the file with Read and Write permission, if failed, try only
> >>Read permision
> >>
> >>For compatibility reasons, the default is 'auto'. Should be changed later
> >>on.
> >>
> >>This option is to replace the 'readonly' options added lately.
> >
> >Can we take the readonly parameter away? It's undocumented, for
> >whatever that's worth...
>
> readonly made 0.12. Semantics, readonly makes it to the disk emulation
> whereas this effects how the file is opened.
With readonly in 0.12, if you _don't specify readonly, and the file is
opened readonly because it applies qemu's fallback behaviour - does
*that* read-only property make it to the disk emulation? Or do guests
still see unexplained I/O errors in that case?
Btw, wasn't the access=[rw|ro|auto] option supposed to affect disk
emulation too?
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4B320927.8020702@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <m3ljgsbux8.fsf@crossbow.pond.sub.org>
2010-01-04 20:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Added 'access' option to -drive flag Anthony Liguori
2010-01-06 0:19 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2010-01-06 7:47 ` Naphtali Sprei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100106001950.GA25683@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=nsprei@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).