From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSvr0-0005sP-5d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:08:58 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSvqv-0005qj-BL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:08:57 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57944 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSvqu-0005qg-Qh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:08:53 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:16595)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1NSvqs-0006ca-OV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:08:52 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1NSvqa-0001Of-KT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:08:32 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:08:22 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add KVM paravirt cpuid leaf
Message-ID: <20100107170822.GB4537@redhat.com>
References: <20100107124449.GY4905@redhat.com> <4B46072C.80909@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100107161503.GE4905@redhat.com> <4B46118A.9050101@codemonkey.ws>
	<4B46123F.7000501@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B46123F.7000501@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:56:31PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 06:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >I don't want to deviate unnecessarily from qemu-kvm so we can
> >approach this in one of two ways.  We can remove the guard in
> >qemu-kvm and Avi can send me a pull request with this feature.  I
> >can also just pull in the patch as-is and we can fix this in both
> >places later.  I'm happy either way.
> 
> Let's go through qemu-kvm.git.  I'll post information about the
> queue policy soon.
> 
Till yesterday it was other way around. May be switch rules after
applying the patch?

--
			Gleb.