From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: New kvm-related qemu patch queue
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:28:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100110142820.GN4905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B49C1D3.1070308@redhat.com>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:02:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> In order to improve qemu.git kvm integration quality wrt
> performance, features, and reliability Marcelo and I will begin to
> maintain a patch queue based on qemu.git containing kvm-related
> patches. We will review and apply patches to this queue, test them
> using the same test suite that is used for qemu-kvm.git, and
> regularly submit them for inclusion in qemu.git, mimicking the
> relationship between kvm.git and Linus' linux-2.6.git.
>
> One of the problems of qemu.git kvm support is that it is a clean
> reimplementation, and thus some of the nuances that were carefully
> ironed out in qemu-kvm.git are lost. To that end, we would like to
> change the process of adding features as follows:
>
> - first, the feature in qemu-kvm.git master is morphed to a form
> suitable for merging into qemu.git
> - when that has been accomplished, the feature is broken into
> patches and merged into the patch queue
>
If there is the same feature in qemu-kvm.git and qemu.git whom is morphed to
whom and who is merged where? I am confused. We have much of duplicated
code between qemu-kvm.git and qemu.git it is often almost, but not exactly the
same. Is it really productive to set rules who should be morphed and how
at this point?
> This process ensures that important details are not lost: the
> morphing step attempts to preserve all the nuances, and it is much
> easier to spot a behaviour change in a review than to spot a missing
> behaviour in a new feature. This was successfully used to merge
> i386 and x86_64 arch support in Linux.
>
> Some qemu-kvm.git features (primarily support for very old kernels)
> can be dropped, simplifying the convergence process.
>
> Over time, qemu-kvm.git master will converge with qemu.git master
> and all that will remain is the patch queue.
>
> Features in qemu-kvm.git not present in qemu.git include:
> - smp support
> - in-kernel irqchip
> - in-kernel pit
> - tpr patching
> - device assignment
> - kvm paravirtualization
> - boot=on (extboot, or a real option rom)
> - test suite
> - ia64
> - signalfd support
>
> Many others are implemented differently in the two trees.
>
> The patch queue will appear as a branch 'uq/master' (for 'upstream
> queue); if necessary branches for the stable series will also be
> created.
>
> In order to get a kvm feature into qemu.git, please observe the
> following process:
>
> - post a patch series against qemu-kvm.git/master that implements
> the feature, or changes an existing feature to use qemu.git
> infrastructure
It was other way around till last week. Why change?
> - once that's merged, post a patch series against
> qemu-kvm.git/uq/master that brings the same code into qemu.git.
>
> The new branch will be subject to the same automatic testing that
> qemu-kvm.git is.
>
> Please post patches to both qemu-devel and kvm mailing lists.
>
> This won't work for all features, so we'll have to feel our way and
> make decisions on a case by case basis.
>
>
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-10 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 12:02 [Qemu-devel] New kvm-related qemu patch queue Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 14:28 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-01-10 14:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 14:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-01-10 14:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 7:51 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-01-11 15:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-17 12:51 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100110142820.GN4905@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).