qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: New kvm-related qemu patch queue
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:49:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100110144904.GO4905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B49E494.3030400@redhat.com>

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:30:44PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/10/2010 04:28 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:02:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>In order to improve qemu.git kvm integration quality wrt
> >>performance, features, and reliability Marcelo and I will begin to
> >>maintain a patch queue based on qemu.git containing kvm-related
> >>patches.  We will review and apply patches to this queue, test them
> >>using the same test suite that is used for qemu-kvm.git, and
> >>regularly submit them for inclusion in qemu.git, mimicking the
> >>relationship between kvm.git and Linus' linux-2.6.git.
> >>
> >>One of the problems of qemu.git kvm support is that it is a clean
> >>reimplementation, and thus some of the nuances that were carefully
> >>ironed out in qemu-kvm.git are lost.  To that end, we would like to
> >>change the process of adding features as follows:
> >>
> >>  - first, the feature in qemu-kvm.git master is morphed to a form
> >>suitable for merging into qemu.git
> >>  - when that has been accomplished, the feature is broken into
> >>patches and merged into the patch queue
> >>
> >If there is the same feature in qemu-kvm.git and qemu.git whom is morphed to
> >whom and who is merged where? I am confused. We have much of duplicated
> >code between qemu-kvm.git and qemu.git it is often almost, but not exactly the
> >same. Is it really productive to set rules who should be morphed and how
> >at this point?
> 
> If the feature is already in both, then morph qemu-kvm.git into what
> is already in qemu.git.  Hopefully anything missing in qemu.git will
> be discovered while making the changes.
> 
What about bugs that are present only in qemu.git? Like this:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/42298/. Should it go through
qemu-kvm.git/uq/master?

What about this one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/42447/ should it
be postponed untill qemu.git and qemu-kvm.git converge on using the same
cpuid infrastructure, or add similar functionality to qemu-kvm to,
or add new cpu flags to qemu-kvm only and when cpuid code converge
qemu.git will have it too?

> >>In order to get a kvm feature into qemu.git, please observe the
> >>following process:
> >>
> >>- post a patch series against qemu-kvm.git/master that implements
> >>the feature, or changes an existing feature to use qemu.git
> >>infrastructure
> >It was other way around till last week. Why change?
> 
> There were a lot of regressions.
> 
Yeah :(

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-10 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-10 12:02 [Qemu-devel] New kvm-related qemu patch queue Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 14:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gleb Natapov
2010-01-10 14:30   ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 14:49     ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-01-10 14:52       ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11  7:51         ` Gleb Natapov
2010-01-11 15:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-17 12:51   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100110144904.GO4905@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).