qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com>,
	Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] performance improvement for windows guests, running on top of virtio block device
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:20:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100111182048.GA12121@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4B3796.1010106@codemonkey.ws>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:37:10AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2010 08:29 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 01/11/2010 03:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> So instead of disabling notify while requests are active we might want
>>>> to only disable it while we are inside virtio_blk_handle_output.
>>>> Something like the following minimally tested patch:
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd suggest that we get even more aggressive and install an idle  
>>> bottom half that checks the queue for newly submitted requests.  If  
>>> we keep getting requests submitted before a new one completes, we'll  
>>> never take an I/O exit.
>>>
>>
>> That has the downside of bouncing a cache line on unrelated exits.
>
> The read and write sides of the ring are widely separated in physical  
> memory specifically to avoid cache line bouncing.
>
>>   It probably doesn't matter with qemu as it is now, since it will  
>> bounce qemu_mutex, but it will hurt with large guests (especially if  
>> they have many rings).
>>
>> IMO we should get things to work well without riding on unrelated  
>> exits, especially as we're trying to reduce those exits.
>
> A block I/O request can potentially be very, very long lived.  By  
> serializing requests like this, there's a high likelihood that it's  
> going to kill performance with anything capable of processing multiple  
> requests.
>
> OTOH, if we aggressively poll the ring when we have an opportunity to,  
> there's very little down side to that and it addresses the serialization  
> problem.
>
>>> The same approach is probably a good idea for virtio-net.
>>
>> With vhost-net you don't see exits.
>
> The point is, when we've disabled notification, we should poll on the  
> ring for additional requests instead of waiting for one to complete  
> before looking at another one.
>
> Even with vhost-net, this logic is still applicable although potentially  
> harder to achieve.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>

vhost net does this already: it has a mode where it poll when skbs have
left send queue: for tap this is when they have crossed the bridge, for packet
socket this is when they have been transmitted.

-- 
MST

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-11 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-11  7:40 [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH] performance improvement for windows guests, running on top of virtio block device Vadim Rozenfeld
2010-01-11  8:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
     [not found]   ` <4B4AE95D.7080305@redhat.com>
2010-01-11  9:19     ` Dor Laor
2010-01-11 13:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-11 13:13         ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 13:16           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-11 13:47           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-11 14:00             ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-24  2:58               ` Paul Brook
2010-02-24 14:59                 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-25 15:06                   ` Paul Brook
2010-02-25 15:23                     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-25 16:48                       ` Paul Brook
2010-02-25 17:11                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-25 17:15                       ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-25 17:33                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-25 18:05                           ` malc
2010-02-25 19:55                           ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-26  8:47                             ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-26 14:36                               ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-26 15:39                                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 13:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-11 13:49     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-11 14:29       ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 14:37         ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-11 14:46           ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 15:13             ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-11 15:19               ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 15:22                 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-11 15:31                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 15:32                     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-11 15:35                       ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-11 15:38                         ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-11 18:22               ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-01-11 18:20           ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-01-11 14:25     ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100111182048.GA12121@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vrozenfe@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).