qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QMP forward compatibility support
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:43:27 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113154327.5c3d245c@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hbqplxam.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:38:57 +0100
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:

> Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:53:38 +0100
> > Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> writes:
> [...]
> >> >  I'm thinking in something like this:
> >> >
> >> > 1. Connection is made, the greeting message is sent and QMP is
> >> > in 'handshake mode'
> >> >
> >> > 2. In this mode only commands to enable/disable protocol
> >> > capabilities are allowed
> >> >
> >> > 3. When the client is done with the setup, it issues the
> >> > command 'enable-qmp', which puts the protocol into 'running mode',
> >> > where any command is accepted
> >> 
> >> Really "any command"?  What about commands to enable/disable protocol
> >> capabilities?
> >
> >  I think that playing with some protocol bits might be safe, like
> > enabling async messages.
> >
> >  I'm not saying this is a good practice, but forbidding it seems a bit
> > extreme at first.
> 
> Allowing stuff when it turns out to be needed is less painful than
> outlawing stuff when it turns out to be problematic.

 I forgot to mention we can block them, that's fine. :)

 So, do we agree with the general design? I'll cook a RFC series.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-13 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-11 18:34 [Qemu-devel] QMP forward compatibility support Luiz Capitulino
2010-01-11 18:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-11 19:49   ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-01-12  0:04   ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-01-12  0:24     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-12  8:16       ` Markus Armbruster
2010-01-12 12:19         ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-01-12 12:11       ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-01-13 16:53         ` Markus Armbruster
2010-01-13 17:06           ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-01-13 17:38             ` Markus Armbruster
2010-01-13 17:43               ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2010-01-14  0:01           ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100113154327.5c3d245c@doriath \
    --to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).