From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NXMRU-0002TA-U3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:20:56 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NXMRQ-0002SK-Hl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:20:56 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60941 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NXMRQ-0002SH-AB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:20:52 -0500
Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:41161 helo=sequoia.sous-sol.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <chrisw@sous-sol.org>) id 1NXMRP-0003Gr-T4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:20:52 -0500
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:20:43 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..
Message-ID: <20100119222043.GH3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
References: <4B549016.6090501@redhat.com> <4B560A88.9@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
	<20100119221213.GB11920@shareable.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100119221213.GB11920@shareable.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: "Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@amd.com>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>

* Jamie Lokier (jamie@shareable.org) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Anthony Liguori (anthony@codemonkey.ws) wrote:
> > > I'm very much against having -cpu Nehalem.  The whole point of this=
 is =20
> > > to make things easier for a user and for most of the users I've =20
> > > encountered, -cpu Nehalem is just as obscure as -cpu=20
> > > qemu64,-sse3,+vmx,...
> >=20
> > What name will these users know?  FWIW, it makes sense to me as it is.
>=20
> 2001, 2005, 2008, 2010 :-)

Heh, sadly not far from the truth I bet ;-)  Flip side, if you deploy
the sekrit decoder ring at ark.intel.com, the Xeon=AE + number seems
equally obscure.  Seems we'll never make 'em all happy.

thanks,
-chris