From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZT5l-0006v6-59 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:51:13 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZT5g-0006nD-SA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:51:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48413 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZT5g-0006mz-Mx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:51:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6983) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZT5g-0006l6-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:51:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:47:56 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] win32: use PRId64 instead of %lld Message-ID: <20100125174756.GB11998@redhat.com> References: <1264368221-3040-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> <20100125100905.GA9019@redhat.com> <4B5DD596.4040503@mail.berlios.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5DD596.4040503@mail.berlios.de> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: Herve Poussineau , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:32:06PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb: > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 09:23:41PM +0000, Herve Poussineau wrote: > >> Replace %lld occurrences by PRId64. > > > > This is wrong. > > long long values should be printed with %lld. > > size_t - with %zd. PRId64 is for int64_t. > > > > size_t => %zu, ssize_t => %zd might be better. > > And none of them works on win32, so using them > there can result in a crash: > > size_t st = 4711; > fprintf(stderr, "st=%zu, %s\n", st, "test"); > > printf functions on win32 don't know %z. > They run > > fprintf(stderr, "st=zu, %s\n", st, "test"); > > which results in an memory access fault when printf > wants to read the memory at address 0x4711. > > Regards, > Stefan Weil Let's just implement a compliant printf?