From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZkLm-0002s8-7H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:16:54 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZkLh-0002py-7G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:16:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32782 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZkLh-0002pq-2l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:16:49 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49120) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZkLg-0000E1-LU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:16:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:16:34 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20100126101634.1797afed@doriath> In-Reply-To: <1264443524.2890.3.camel@aglitke> References: <1264443524.2890.3.camel@aglitke> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] New API for asynchronous monitor commands (V2) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Adam Litke Cc: Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:18:44 -0600 Adam Litke wrote: > Changes since V1: > - Miscellaneous code cleanups (Thanks Luiz) > > Qemu has a number of commands that can operate asynchronously (savevm, migrate, > etc) and it will be getting more. For these commands, the user monitor needs > to be suspended, but QMP monitors could continue to to accept other commands. > This patch introduces a new command API that isolates the details of handling > different monitor types from the actual command execution. > > A monitor command can use this API by implementing the mhandler.cmd_async > handler (or info_async if appropriate). This function is responsible for > submitting the command and does not return any data although it may raise > errors. When the command completes, the QMPCompletion callback should be > invoked with its opaque data and the command result. > > The process for submitting and completing an asynchronous command is different > for QMP and user monitors. A user monitor must be suspended at submit time and > resumed at completion time. The user_print() function must be passed to the > QMPCompletion callback so the result can be displayed properly. QMP monitors > are simpler. No submit time setup is required. When the command completes, > monitor_protocol_emitter() writes the result in JSON format. s/QMPCompletion/MonitorCompletion Otherwise looks good to me.