From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZlGF-0000W5-5L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:15:15 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZlGA-0000Sc-AH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:15:14 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33567 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZlGA-0000SS-36
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:15:10 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53193)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1NZlG9-00007i-63
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:15:09 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:12:02 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] win32: use PRId64 instead of %lld
Message-ID: <20100126131202.GG19036@redhat.com>
References: <20100125100905.GA9019@redhat.com>
	<20100125120348.461ce622@doriath>
	<m3k4v6s14m.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<20100125132719.23a483cf@doriath>
	<20100125153838.GB11161@redhat.com>
	<20100126094329.70719b6f@doriath>
	<m3my016nz4.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<4B5EE66A.1080600@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100126125621.GD19036@redhat.com>
	<4B5EE87D.3070003@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B5EE87D.3070003@codemonkey.ws>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Herve Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:05:01AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 06:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Then we'll have to support it forever. Asking clients to only depend on
>> valid JSON will make sure we can use json library in the future, as well
>> as allow easier debugging etc.
>>    
>
> As I mentioned in IRC, I'm not opposed to making this feature of the  
> parser not exposed when dealing with external clients.
>
> But I do believe that we're going to have to extend JSON down the road.   
> This particular extension is unimportant so I don't mind limiting it's  
> visibility.

I agree.

> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori