From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZlgS-0005uM-CS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:42:20 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZlgN-0005qD-JU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:42:19 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46928 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZlgN-0005q6-BX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:42:15 -0500
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:49561)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1NZlgM-0003H3-Re
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:42:15 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:42:10 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: prevent multiwrite_merge from
	creating too large iovecs
Message-ID: <20100126134210.GA1644@lst.de>
References: <20100119211539.GA4383@lst.de> <4B56EB0F.2020409@redhat.com>
	<20100126092104.GA21528@lst.de> <4B5EE944.9050602@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B5EE944.9050602@codemonkey.ws>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:08:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >I can either throw in an #ifdef IOV_MAX around the check or fake one up
> >for mingw.  Does any of the maintainers have a preference for either
> >variant?
> >   
> 
> grep for CONFIG_IOVEC in qemu-common.h and add a #define IOV_MAX.
> 
> mingw doesn't have iovec so we introduce a compat version.

Yes, that's what I meant with the second alternative above.