From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Converting existing name=value,... arguments to QMP
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:54:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100204175438.GA17226@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3fx5gx5fp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:43:22PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The human monitor uses positional arguments. This is fine; nobody wants
> to type "info item=network" instead of "info network".
>
> QMP uses named arguments. Also fine.
>
> Internally, we use named arguments: we pass them as QDict to the command
> handler. This involves associating positional arguments with names.
> Works fine.
>
> There's one little mess hiding in a corner, though: a few commands abuse
> a positional argument to get named arguments. That argument has the
> form of a "parameter string": NAME=VALUE,... For instance:
>
> pci_add auto nic model=e1000,macaddr=00:11:22:33:44:55
>
> If we convert this naively, we get in QMP:
>
> { "execute": "pci_add",
> "arguments": { "pci_addr": "auto",
> "type": "nic",
> "opts": "model=e1000,macaddr=00:11:22:33:44:55" } }
>
> which is silly. Oops, we already did.
This isn't so silly, because it allows the mgmt apps to re-use the
exact same code for generating the 'opts' string here that they
already have written to generate the initial '-net' argument value
when launching QEMU. That is a very big benefit that I would not
like to loose
> A more appropriate encoding would be
>
> { "execute": "pci_add",
> "arguments": { "pci_addr": "auto",
> "type": "nic",
> "model": "e1000",
> "macaddr": "00:11:22:33:44:55" } }
>
> or maybe
>
> { "execute": "pci_add",
> "arguments": { "pci_addr": "auto",
> "type": "nic",
> "opts": { "model": "e1000",
> "macaddr": "00:11:22:33:44:55" } } }
Both these approaches mean extra code for client apps, by not allowing
re-use of the ARGV argument generators they must already implement.
That said I can see the value in allowing the "fully normalized" format,
so if going for the second option, then I'd say that QEMU should use its
existing key,value pair parser to automagically convert this:
> "opts": "model=e1000,macaddr=00:11:22:33:44:55" } }
into this
> "opts": { "model": "e1000",
> "macaddr": "00:11:22:33:44:55" } } }
in case where it saw a JSON string, instead of hash.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-04 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-04 17:43 [Qemu-devel] Converting existing name=value,... arguments to QMP Markus Armbruster
2010-02-04 17:54 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100204175438.GA17226@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).