qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rework of guest debug state writing
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:05:55 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100204180555.GA3861@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6AEAB8.3030509@siemens.com>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:41:44PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:33:50AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:29:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>>> So far we synchronized any dirty VCPU state back into the kernel before
> >>>>> updating the guest debug state. This was a tribute to a deficit in x86
> >>>>> kernels before 2.6.33. But as this is an arch-dependent issue, it is
> >>>>> better handle in the x86 part of KVM and remove the writeback point for
> >>>>> generic code.
> >>>> Jan,
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch breaks migration.
> >>> Can you elaborate what you did? I can't reproduce, and I do not see any
> >>> conceptual issue (given that guest debugging conflicts with migration
> >>> anyway).
> >> kvm-autotest fails (migration only, install is ok, both Linux and Win
> >> guests). Not sure why, perhaps the unconditional KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
> >> corrupts state somehow? 
> >>
> >> Tested with io thread enabled.
> > 
> > That's this default-off thing, so... OK, confirmed, investigating.
> > 
> 
> Heisenbug: It first also popped up (in form of a frozen migration
> target) after removing this patch, but now it's totally unreproducible,
> whatever patch I apply or revert from my series. Base is current master.
>
> I tend to think there is a hidden issue of iothread vs. migration,
> unrelated to this patch.

Probably many :)

Do you have c5f32c99c6855d466737daf1cd262e7e92062f87 (from qemu-kvm.git
uq/master) in?

With kvm-autotest the failure is not sporadic (and the above commit
applied): with KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG in arch_put_regs all migration 
tests fail, without, all of them succeed. 

So env->kvm_guest_debug has been zeroed by cpu_x86_init, which means
the writeback via KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG does almost nothing. It does
get_rflags and set_rflags in the kernel.

Test box is off, but the synchronous writeback via qemu_system_reset
in main, after machine and vcpu thread initialization, might be
problematic. But it would be nice to understand this.

Unrelated to this problem, won't put_vcpu_events, which is executed 
after KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG, overwrite any queued debug exceptions?

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-04 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-03 21:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] KVM pull request: Various fixes and cleanups Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Fix up misreported CPU features Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] KVM: Make vmport KVM-compatible Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Move and rename regs_modified Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rework of guest debug state writing Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 23:49   ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04  0:33     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 13:00       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 15:04         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 15:41           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 18:05             ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-02-04 18:53               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:00                 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-08 15:52                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 16:07                     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:21                 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 20:50                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 15:52                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-03 21:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] KVM pull request: Various fixes and cleanups Anthony Liguori
2010-02-03 21:54   ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100204180555.GA3861@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).