From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NeWW0-0002Lz-Ov for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:31:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47046 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NeWW0-0002Lo-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:31:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeWVy-0006qJ-LT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:31:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44275) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeWVy-0006q5-8y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:31:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:27:53 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] pci: initialize header type register. Message-ID: <20100208162753.GA28230@redhat.com> References: <20100208064147.GD22624@valinux.co.jp> <20100208101753.GA14662@redhat.com> <4B6FF203.6010304@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6FF203.6010304@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Blue Swirl , Isaku Yamahata , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 12:14:11PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 02/08/10 11:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:41:47PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: >>> initialize header type register in pci generic code. >>> >>> Cc: Blue Swirl >>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" >>> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata >> >> No objections here, I am assuming this will be followed >> by patches removing header type init from bridges? >> From qdev perspective, it is probably cleaner to make >> multifunction bit a separate qdev property though, right? > > From a qdev perspective it would make *alot* of sense to move a bunch of > pci config stuff (including, but not limited to header type) into > PCIDeviceInfo. > > cheers, > Gerd Actually - won't this make it possible to create broken configurations by tweaking properties from command-line? And generally, it sounds bad to have header type duplicated in qdev and in config. Why do we want it in qdev? Isaku Yamahata, could you please clarify? -- MT