From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NezSf-0004mQ-Mt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:25:41 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36463 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NezSf-0004mI-AV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:25:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1NezSd-0005SX-GX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:25:41 -0500
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:58099)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>)
	id 1NezSd-0005SP-4P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:25:39 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:25:32 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Seabios dislikes -M isapc
Message-ID: <20100209232531.GC2462@volta.aurel32.net>
References: <4B6FE4BD.5010304@siemens.com> <4B71BC80.30905@codemonkey.ws>
	<24DBE33F-1742-4534-A943-65D9A3579A81@claunia.com>
	<4B71CE0C.90204@codemonkey.ws>
	<7DDDDCA5-2F86-4644-B7B3-A714AEDA56CA@claunia.com>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1002100139500.14423@linmac>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1002100139500.14423@linmac>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 01:41:01AM +0300, malc wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> 
> > Xenix is currently working (when copied from real hardware).
> > As well Interactive UNIX and some other non-DOS from 8086 and 286 era.
> > 
> > I'm not really sure that operating systems (specially the 8086 ones that do
> > mmu functions in software) will be happy with the PCI bus present.
> > 
> > Same for first 386 operating systems (OS/2 2, UNIX, Xenix, so on).
> 
> News to me that OS/2 worked.. I don't quite remember which version
> someone (you?) asked me to try on IRC a few years back, but it definitely
> didn't work.
> 

I have got OS/2 warp working under QEMU a few years ago. I couldn't give
more details though, I just remember it was working nicely.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net