From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:58:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002150658.34614.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8DF180F8-A6F3-4306-9B02-C6870156ADB1@suse.de>
On Monday 15 February 2010 05:19:24 Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 15.02.2010, at 12:10, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 February 2010 08:41:00 Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> So the only case I can imagine that this breaks anything is that
> >> uClibc requires register state to be 0.
> >
> > Yes, r3 (which is the exit code from the "exec" syscall, and thus 0 if it
> > worked). In the BSD layout, it's argc (which can never be 0).
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-03/msg00720.html
>
> So what you really want is something like
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX_USER
> /* exec return value is always 0 */
> env->gpr[3] = 0;
> #endif
>
> just after the #endif in your patch. If you had inlined your patch I
> could've commented it there.
Unfortunately kmail plays fast and loose with whitespace when I inline stuff.
(Not always, but I can't tell by inspection when it's decided it was hungry
for tabs or wanted to throw in that horrible UTF8 escaped whitespace.)
I didn't explicitly set it because they're initialized to zero in function
main() on line 2654 of linux-user/main.c. (Any regs we don't explicitly set
to some other value start out zeroed in qemu.)
If you prefer to make the requirements explicit, that works too, but a comment
might do just as well. (I tend to prefer removing unnecessary work Linux
doesn't need done, rather than adding extra code to undo the unnecessary work
afterwards. Force of habit from years on busybox and such.)
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-15 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 11:20 [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries Rob Landley
2010-02-11 12:32 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-14 8:36 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-14 14:41 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-15 11:10 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-15 11:19 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-15 12:58 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2010-02-15 13:01 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 18:31 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-16 18:36 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 19:14 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-15 13:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-02-16 0:52 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-16 9:31 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 18:14 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-17 9:24 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-17 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-17 18:55 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-17 20:46 ` Blue Swirl
2010-02-18 11:38 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-18 13:17 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-18 14:10 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-18 13:05 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-18 11:21 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-18 13:14 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-18 14:19 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-20 17:17 ` [Qemu-devel] Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.) Rob Landley
2010-02-20 17:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2010-02-20 18:38 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-20 21:59 ` Blue Swirl
2010-02-20 23:12 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-21 16:25 ` [Qemu-devel] Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28 Rob Landley
2010-02-21 23:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " David Miller
2010-02-22 0:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-02-22 2:03 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-22 2:06 ` David Miller
2010-02-20 21:59 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.) Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-20 21:39 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-20 22:03 ` Blue Swirl
2010-02-17 16:36 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries Rob Landley
2010-02-16 8:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stuart Brady
2010-02-28 21:05 ` Aurelien Jarno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002150658.34614.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).