From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nh9G2-0003eM-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:17:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48089 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nh9G1-0003dr-US for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:17:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nh9G0-0006Rl-My for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:17:33 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:36476) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nh9G0-0006Rd-9h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:17:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:17:27 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Heads up: glibc preadv emulation breaks qemu on older kernels Message-ID: <20100215221727.GB19495@lst.de> References: <20100211190608.GA26410@amd.home.annexia.org> <20100212125238.GA22221@lst.de> <20100212135044.GA24209@lst.de> <4B758FD9.2010807@codemonkey.ws> <20100212184755.GQ10004@amd.home.annexia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100212184755.GQ10004@amd.home.annexia.org> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 06:47:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I don't think there's a good solution for this at the qemu level. > However I have a working patch for glibc: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563103#c13 Any chance you could just persuade Uli to drop the optimization? I think users are generally better off to just do it themselves, as they have to do that anyway for portable applications.