From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NjVU6-0003iZ-UJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:25:50 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41783 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NjVU5-0003hs-Rl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:25:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NjVU5-0005PY-15 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:25:49 -0500 Received: from duck.dooz.org ([194.146.227.125]:33070) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NjVU4-0005P3-OG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:25:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:25:39 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Detect and use GCC atomic builtins for locking Message-ID: <20100222102539.GA4901@bee.dooz.org> References: <1266613360-23069-1-git-send-email-lool@dooz.org> <20100220081625.GA9788@bee.dooz.org> <20100220091037.GC9788@bee.dooz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Feb 20, 2010, malc wrote: > No, i'm against using locking GCC builtins for all the other targets (w= ell > PPC) Do you have benchmarks with/without GCC atomic builtins? --=20 Lo=EFc Minier