From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nk3i1-0004kc-Nc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:58:29 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56473 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nk3i1-0004kK-8b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:58:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1Nk3hz-0007ag-Si
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:58:29 -0500
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:42721)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>)
	id 1Nk3hz-0007aa-Gb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:58:27 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:58:25 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] target-alpha: fpu qualifiers, round 2
Message-ID: <20100223225825.GS10348@hall.aurel32.net>
References: <4B2BFD85.6070702@twiddle.net>
	<cover.1262645165.git.rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1262645165.git.rth@twiddle.net>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: laurent.desnogues@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:46:05PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I've split up the FPCR as requested by Aurelien.  We no longer 
> set anything in FP_STATUS after the execution of the operation,
> only copy data from FP_STATUS to some env->fpcr field.
> 
> I have totally rewritten the patch to be more along the line 
> that Laurent was suggesting, in that the rounding mode and other
> qualifiers are totally parsed within the translator.  I no longer
> pass the FN11 field to the helper functions.
> 

What's the benefit of doing that? I don't say it's wrong, I just want
to understand. Otherwise the patch looks good, so it can probably be
applied without any change.

In the meanwhile, I have applied patches 1 to 5.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net