From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nl1d9-0007bB-Sb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:57:27 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56695 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nl1d9-0007ah-6K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:57:27 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Nl1d7-0002gO-W8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:57:26 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18169)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Nl1d7-0002gG-Jw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:57:25 -0500
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:54:11 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20100226145411.GF23359@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1267122331.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<af686d9630f18829e4e2ba1333a198efea1126b6.1267122331.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<m31vg9m91m.fsf@trasno.mitica> <20100226143242.GA23359@redhat.com>
	<4B87DCE3.2020406@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B87DCE3.2020406@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 09/12] vhost: vhost net support
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:38:27AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/26/2010 08:32 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> and
>>> --enable-vhost/--disable-vhost options.
>>>
>>>      
>> I don't really see why we need --enable-vhost/--disable-vhost.
>> Runtime flag is enough.
>>    
>
> So that packagers can disable features at build time that they don't  
> want to support.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori

Fair enough.