From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Np8ja-0006Eq-Nm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:21:06 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42615 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Np8jZ-0006EV-OO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:21:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1Np8jY-00075z-MD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:21:05 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:11907)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>)
	id 1Np8jY-00075u-EG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:21:04 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1Np8jX-0005Am-HA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:21:03 -0500
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:18:48 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event
Message-ID: <20100309201848.4f470fe7@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B96D3B2.6070204@codemonkey.ws>
References: <1268175216-3600-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<4B96D3B2.6070204@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, uril@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:03:14 -0600
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:

> On 03/09/2010 04:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >   Hi,
> >
> >   This series is based on a previous series submitted by Uri Lublin:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-03/msg00864.html
> >
> >   Details on the patches, except for this question: does it make sense to have
> > a 'low' watermark for block devices?
> >    
> 
> Does it make sense to have a high watermark?

 Yes, as it avoids polling :)