From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH QEMU] transparent hugepage support
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:24:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003121624.24870.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100312161724.GT5677@random.random>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:04:03PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > > > $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hpage_pmd_size
> > > > > 2097152
>
> > Hmm, ok. I'm guessing linux doesn't support anything other than "huge"
> > and "normal" page sizes now, so it's a question of whether we want it to
> > expose current implementation details, or say "Align big in-memory things
> > this much for optimal TLB behavior".
>
> hugetlbfs already exposes the implementation detail. So if you want
> that it's already available. The whole point of going the extra mile
> with a transparent solution is to avoid userland to increase in
> complexity and to keep it as unaware of hugepages as possible. The
> madvise hint basically means "this won't risk to waste memory if you
> use large tlb on this mapping" and also "this mapping is more
> important than others to be backed by hugepages". It's up to the
> kernel what to do next. For example right now khugepaged doesn't
> prioritize scanning the madvise regions first, it basically doesn't
> matter for hypervisor solutions in the cloud (all anon memory in the
> system is only allocated by kvm...). But later we may prioritize it
> and try to be smarter from the hint given by userland.
So shouldn't [the name of] the value the kernel provides for recommended
alignment be equally implementation agnostic?
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 15:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH QEMU] transparent hugepage support Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-11 15:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-11 16:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-13 8:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-13 17:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-11 16:28 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-11 16:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-11 17:55 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-11 18:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-12 11:36 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-12 14:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-12 16:04 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-12 16:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-12 16:24 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2010-03-12 16:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-12 17:10 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-12 17:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-12 18:17 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-12 18:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-12 18:41 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-12 18:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-03-12 22:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-12 16:10 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003121624.24870.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).