From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nr9wy-0002I9-3H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:03:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41073 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nr9wx-0002Hr-K1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:03:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nr9ww-0006OA-28 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:03:15 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([88.198.83.132]:57350) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nr9wv-0006Nx-N0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:03:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:03:11 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Ideas wiki for GSoC 2010 Message-ID: <20100315130310.GE13108@8bytes.org> References: <20100310183023.6632aece@redhat.com> <4B9E2745.7060903@redhat.com> <20100315125313.GK9457@il.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100315125313.GK9457@il.ibm.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Muli Ben-Yehuda Cc: agraf@suse.de, aliguori@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino , Avi Kivity , agl@us.ibm.com, Nadav Amit , Ben-Ami Yassour1 On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:53:13AM -0700, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well: > > > > > >http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010 > > > > I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful > > for doing device assignment to nested guests, which could make > > testing a lot easier. > > Our experiments show that nested device assignment is pretty much > required for I/O performance in nested scenarios. Really? I did a small test with virtio-blk in a nested guest (disk read with dd, so not a real benchmark) and got a reasonable read-performance of around 25MB/s from the disk in the l2-guest. Joerg