From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NrUO8-0007FQ-0E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:52:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34580 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NrUO5-0007EJ-JP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:52:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NrUO3-0006BJ-AK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:52:37 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:48410) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NrUO2-0006Ar-OF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:52:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NrUHM-0003v0-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:45:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:45:37 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20100316104537.GH23617@redhat.com> References: <20100316070155.GK3732@x200.localdomain> <20100316092944.GB23617@redhat.com> <4B9F52D4.2030208@redhat.com> <20100316103146.GF23617@redhat.com> <4B9F5F8A.4080105@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B9F5F8A.4080105@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 16 Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Juan Quintela On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38:02PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/16/2010 12:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>Polling loops are an indication that something is wrong. > >> > >Except when people suggest they are the right answer, qcow high > >watermark ;-P > > > > I liked Anthony's suggestion of an lvm2 block format driver. No polling. Doesn't that require giving QEMU privileges to perform LVM operations which implies QEMU having CAP_SYS_ADMIN ? Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|