* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering.
@ 2010-03-16 15:45 Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2010-03-16 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
---
tcg/tcg.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
index 1818868..d753149 100644
--- a/tcg/tcg.c
+++ b/tcg/tcg.c
@@ -596,7 +596,17 @@ void tcg_gen_callN(TCGContext *s, TCGv_ptr func, unsigned int flags,
real_args++;
}
#endif
-#ifdef TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
+ /* If stack grows up, then we will be placing successive
+ arguments at lower addresses, which means we need to
+ reverse the order compared to how we would normally
+ treat either big or little-endian. For those arguments
+ that will wind up in registers, this still works for
+ HPPA (the only current STACK_GROWSUP target) since the
+ argument registers are *also* allocated in decreasing
+ order. If another such target is added, this logic may
+ have to get more complicated to differentiate between
+ stack arguments and register arguments. */
+#if defined(TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN) != defined(TCG_TARGET_STACK_GROWSUP)
*gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i] + 1;
*gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i];
#else
--
1.6.6.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tcg-hppa get it working, v2.1
@ 2010-03-16 15:50 Richard Henderson
2010-03-16 15:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2010-03-16 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Gah. Left out --thread and -s options to format-patch.
Sorry about that.
r~
Richard Henderson (4):
tcg-hppa: Fix const errors in hppa-dis.c.
tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering.
tcg-hppa: Finish the port.
tcg-hppa: Compute is_write in cpu_signal_handler.
configure | 5 +-
cpu-exec.c | 38 +-
hppa-dis.c | 4 +-
tcg/hppa/tcg-target.c | 1846 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
tcg/hppa/tcg-target.h | 142 +---
tcg/tcg.c | 12 +-
6 files changed, 1387 insertions(+), 660 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering.
2010-03-16 15:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tcg-hppa get it working, v2.1 Richard Henderson
@ 2010-03-16 15:52 ` Richard Henderson
2010-03-17 1:49 ` Stuart Brady
2010-03-23 21:27 ` Aurelien Jarno
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2010-03-16 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
---
tcg/tcg.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
index 1818868..d753149 100644
--- a/tcg/tcg.c
+++ b/tcg/tcg.c
@@ -596,7 +596,17 @@ void tcg_gen_callN(TCGContext *s, TCGv_ptr func, unsigned int flags,
real_args++;
}
#endif
-#ifdef TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
+ /* If stack grows up, then we will be placing successive
+ arguments at lower addresses, which means we need to
+ reverse the order compared to how we would normally
+ treat either big or little-endian. For those arguments
+ that will wind up in registers, this still works for
+ HPPA (the only current STACK_GROWSUP target) since the
+ argument registers are *also* allocated in decreasing
+ order. If another such target is added, this logic may
+ have to get more complicated to differentiate between
+ stack arguments and register arguments. */
+#if defined(TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN) != defined(TCG_TARGET_STACK_GROWSUP)
*gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i] + 1;
*gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i];
#else
--
1.6.6.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering.
2010-03-16 15:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering Richard Henderson
@ 2010-03-17 1:49 ` Stuart Brady
2010-03-23 21:27 ` Aurelien Jarno
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Brady @ 2010-03-17 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:32:23AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Acked-by: Stuart Brady <stuart.brady@gmail.com>
> ---
> tcg/tcg.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
> index 1818868..d753149 100644
> --- a/tcg/tcg.c
> +++ b/tcg/tcg.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,17 @@ void tcg_gen_callN(TCGContext *s, TCGv_ptr func, unsigned int flags,
> real_args++;
> }
> #endif
> -#ifdef TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
> + /* If stack grows up, then we will be placing successive
> + arguments at lower addresses, which means we need to
> + reverse the order compared to how we would normally
> + treat either big or little-endian. For those arguments
> + that will wind up in registers, this still works for
> + HPPA (the only current STACK_GROWSUP target) since the
> + argument registers are *also* allocated in decreasing
> + order. If another such target is added, this logic may
> + have to get more complicated to differentiate between
> + stack arguments and register arguments. */
> +#if defined(TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN) != defined(TCG_TARGET_STACK_GROWSUP)
> *gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i] + 1;
> *gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i];
> #else
> --
> 1.6.6.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering.
2010-03-16 15:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering Richard Henderson
2010-03-17 1:49 ` Stuart Brady
@ 2010-03-23 21:27 ` Aurelien Jarno
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2010-03-23 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:32:23AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Thanks, applied.
> ---
> tcg/tcg.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
> index 1818868..d753149 100644
> --- a/tcg/tcg.c
> +++ b/tcg/tcg.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,17 @@ void tcg_gen_callN(TCGContext *s, TCGv_ptr func, unsigned int flags,
> real_args++;
> }
> #endif
> -#ifdef TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
> + /* If stack grows up, then we will be placing successive
> + arguments at lower addresses, which means we need to
> + reverse the order compared to how we would normally
> + treat either big or little-endian. For those arguments
> + that will wind up in registers, this still works for
> + HPPA (the only current STACK_GROWSUP target) since the
> + argument registers are *also* allocated in decreasing
> + order. If another such target is added, this logic may
> + have to get more complicated to differentiate between
> + stack arguments and register arguments. */
> +#if defined(TCG_TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN) != defined(TCG_TARGET_STACK_GROWSUP)
> *gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i] + 1;
> *gen_opparam_ptr++ = args[i];
> #else
> --
> 1.6.6.1
>
>
>
>
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-23 21:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-16 15:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering Richard Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-16 15:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tcg-hppa get it working, v2.1 Richard Henderson
2010-03-16 15:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tcg-hppa: Fix 64-bit argument ordering Richard Henderson
2010-03-17 1:49 ` Stuart Brady
2010-03-23 21:27 ` Aurelien Jarno
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).