From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nrkg9-0000ET-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:16:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44558 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nrkg9-0000EK-0u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:16:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nrkg7-0000Jb-Un for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:16:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5844) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nrkg7-0000JV-Hg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:16:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:44:52 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20100317041452.GE20122@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv5 00/11] vhost-net: upstream integration List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com On (Tue) Mar 16 2010 [19:10:30], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Here's a patchset with vhost support for upstream qemu, > rebased to latest bits, and with all comments I'm aware of > addressed. > > Please consider for merging. Anthony, if you are still deliberating > some issues, maybe the series can be merged partially? This will at > least reduce the amount of noise from reposting the large patchset. > > Changes from v4: > address amit's style comments: mostly renaming for clarity Thanks; looks good except for Juan's comments and a couple that I've posted. Nothing major, though. Amit -- http://log.amitshah.net/