From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NsExV-0001ro-0S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:36:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57251 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsExU-0001r0-5Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:36:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NsExT-0000ZX-2E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:36:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29962) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NsExS-0000ZR-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:36:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:36:01 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QMP: Spec: Private Extensions support Message-ID: <20100318093601.54e7ff45@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20100218182458.07c3be6c@redhat.com> <4B7DB6FC.7040900@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:00:25 +0100 Markus Armbruster wrote: > Anthony asked me to take a stab at rewriting his draft to something more > along the lines of what I'm thinking. Here goes. I put some remarks > [in brackets]. I don't have strong opinions on the differences, so this look ok to me. Anthony?