From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NsRYJ-0001OQ-80
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:03:07 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48518 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsRYI-0001Nq-Pb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:03:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1NsRYH-00041g-Kv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:03:06 -0400
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:55377)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1NsRYH-00041b-Cl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:03:05 -0400
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:03:02 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH,
	RFC] Replace assert(0) with abort() or cpu_abort()
Message-ID: <20100319020302.GE14108@shareable.org>
References: <f43fc5581003130656j408f64bfp7fe4bf486c625624@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3sk82nj16.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<f43fc5581003151023g354dc74cr989f3373f5f1de9a@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3vdcx8ma9.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<hnnf7e$8f9$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<m3ljds3auv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<20100316175523.GD19160@shareable.org>
	<4BA09C72.9060201@redhat.com>
	<f43fc5581003171250h7d30e0adt4c6f52ee52ce24ce@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5581003171250h7d30e0adt4c6f52ee52ce24ce@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Blue Swirl wrote:
> But what if in addition to
> this, the user process forked and the other process ptraced the QEMU
> process,

How good is the cross-arch ptrace() emulation, anyway? :-)

-- Jamie