From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NuBeX-0000cn-Nh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:28:45 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40838 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NuBeS-0000Zi-V7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:28:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1NuBeQ-0001oA-TX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:28:40 -0400
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:51474)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1NuBeQ-0001o6-OF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:28:38 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:28:36 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] tcg-hppa: Finish the port.
Message-ID: <20100323212836.GC19086@hall.aurel32.net>
References: <cover.1268754659.git.rth@twiddle.net>
	<6880f84577b97d0334b95f6ce031e61c65c2e88b.1268754659.git.rth@twiddle.net>
	<20100317015829.GC23195@zubnet.me.uk>
	<4BA0ED8C.8000404@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BA0ED8C.8000404@twiddle.net>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Stuart Brady <sdb@zubnet.me.uk>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 07:56:12AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 06:58 PM, Stuart Brady wrote:
> > The tcg_reg_free() calls worry me slightly, but I assume they're safe...
> 
> Yeah, that one's rather gross.
> 
> Since Aurelien's generic div/rem patch I could simply remove all
> that millicode stuff, including that tcg_reg_free, and let the
> generic code handle this instead.  Which would get to the same
> millicode routine via one or two extra levels of indirection.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

I think that's the way to go. Can you please send a new patch doing
that?

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net