From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NuPnB-00008r-2e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:34:37 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56770 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NuPmx-0006ym-03 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:34:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NuPji-0005YB-Dl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:31:03 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:40560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NuPji-0005Y6-BB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:31:02 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NuPjh-0008Pv-IZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:31:01 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] Supporting hypervisor specific APIs in libvirt Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:30:57 +0000 References: <4BA7C40C.2040505@codemonkey.ws> <4BA91573.9060403@codemonkey.ws> <4BA9A7E1.8080709@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA9A7E1.8080709@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003241230.58160.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: "libvir-list@redhat.com" , Avi Kivity > On 03/23/2010 09:24 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > We also provide an API for guest creation (the qemu command line). > > As an aside, I'd like to see all command line options have qmp > equivalents (most of them can be implemented with a 'set' command that > writes qdev values). This allows a uniform way to control a guest, > whether at startup or runtime. You start with a case, cold-plug a > motherboard, cpus, memory, disk controllers, and power it on. The main blocker to this is converting all the devices to qdev. "partial" conversions are not sufficient. It's approximately the same problem as a machine config file. If you have one then the other should be fairly trivial. IMO the no_user flag is a bug, and should not exist. Paul