From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NuTfp-0004ES-6C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:43:17 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56711 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NuTfl-0004EK-E3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:43:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1NuTfi-0004cM-LH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:43:13 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38888)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1NuTfi-0004bu-Dx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:43:10 -0400
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:42:50 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] Supporting hypervisor specific APIs
	in libvirt
Message-ID: <20100324134250.38822113@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BA9EC88.6000906@redhat.com>
References: <4BA7C40C.2040505@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100323145105.GV16253@redhat.com>
	<4BA8D8A9.7090308@codemonkey.ws>
	<201003231557.19474.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4BA8E6FC.9080207@codemonkey.ws> <4BA901B5.3020704@redhat.com>
	<4BA9A066.3070904@redhat.com> <20100324103643.GB624@redhat.com>
	<4BA9EC88.6000906@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "libvir-list@redhat.com" <libvir-list@redhat.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:42:16 +0200
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> So, at best qemud is a toy for people who are annoyed by libvirt.

 Is the reason for doing this in qemu because libvirt is annoying? I don't see
how adding yet another layer/daemon is going to improve ours and user's life
(the same applies for libqemu).

 If I got it right, there were two complaints from the kvm-devel flamewar:

1. Qemu has usability problems
2. There's no way an external tool can get /proc/kallsyms info from Qemu

 I don't see how libqemu can help with 1) and having qemud doesn't seem
the best solution for 2) either.

 Still talking about 2), what's wrong in getting the PID or having a QMP
connection in a well known location as suggested by Anthony?