From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 1/2] Pass QEMUIOWorker to qemu_notify_event
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:23:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003261523.03617.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100326035558.GA20616@amt.cnet>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:06:00PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > /* Force QEMU to process pending events */
> > > -void qemu_notify_event(void);
> > > +void qemu_notify_event(QEMUIOWorker *worker);
> > >
> > > static void handle_input(VirtIODevice *vdev, VirtQueue *vq)
> > > {
> > > + qemu_notify_event(main_io_worker);
> > > }
> >
> > This feels completely wrong.
> >
> > Devices shouldn't know or care about implementation details like this.
> > How is a device supposed to know which worker it should be waking up?
>
> Its not. It could use qemu_notify_event(DeviceInfo->worker), and have no
> knowledge of the internals.
In that case I think you're abusing this API.
I'm very wary of introducing random bits of code that allegedly allow future
use of threads. Exploiting thread level parallelism is a hard problem that
needs proper design. A such I object to this patch, and think we first need
to decide what form of concurrency model we want to use in QEMU.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 13:59 [Qemu-devel] [patch uq/master 0/2] wake iothread on virtio kick / flush_coalesced_mmio smp_wmb Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-22 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch uq/master 1/2] virtio-pci: wake up iothread on VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_NOTIFY Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-22 14:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 14:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-22 14:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 15:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-22 15:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-22 15:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 15:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-22 15:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-12 2:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/2] introduce QEMUIOWorker and wake up iothread on virtio-serial-bus notification Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-12 2:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 1/2] Pass QEMUIOWorker to qemu_notify_event Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-22 21:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-25 13:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/2] introduce QEMUIOWorker and wake up iothread on virtio-serial-bus notification (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-25 13:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 1/2] Pass QEMUIOWorker to qemu_notify_event Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-25 21:06 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-26 3:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-26 15:23 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2010-03-26 15:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-25 13:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/2] virtio-serial-bus: wake up iothread upon guest read notification Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-12 2:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-12 5:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2010-02-22 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch uq/master 2/2] kvm-all.c: define smp_wmb and use it for coalesced mmio Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-22 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 14:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-22 14:57 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 14:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-02-22 15:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 15:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-02-22 15:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-22 14:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-02-22 16:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-22 17:04 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003261523.03617.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=aliguori@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).