From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvEa0-0004IB-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:48:24 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42176 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvEZy-0004Gw-6C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:48:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvEZu-0005Wo-G1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:48:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvEZu-0005Wf-8i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:48:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:48:12 -0700 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23 Message-ID: <20100326184812.GG26314@x200.localdomain> References: <20100323061140.GN29498@x200.localdomain> <4BA88A6F.2050703@web.de> <4BA88F5D.6040008@redhat.com> <4BA8B7FB.2050103@codemonkey.ws> <4BA8BA84.3020908@redhat.com> <4BAB2F6B.5010400@web.de> <4BAB3054.9030708@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BAB3054.9030708@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Chris Wright , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Jan Kiszka , Avi Kivity * Jes Sorensen (Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com) wrote: > As long as the bits are sitting in the tree without disturbing other > parts, then I just think we should let them sit there. Yup, I agree (there == qemu-kvm.git), and it doesn't need to be a gating factor for pushing the merge into qemu.git. thanks, -chris