From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NxLqB-00069D-Ba for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:57:51 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38714 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxLq5-00064N-Uq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:57:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxLq4-0000Xz-6A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:57:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxLq1-0000XN-99 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:57:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 17:53:57 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix features ack Message-ID: <20100401145356.GA6660@redhat.com> References: <20100331182031.GA5200@redhat.com> <4BB393CF.1040700@codemonkey.ws> <20100331153805.03ee142e@redhat.com> <20100331190753.GA6914@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:38:47PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > > Maybe it makes sense to revert the compile once patches, and discuss > > these issues before re-commit? > > Maybe I'll try to remember this as your favourite problem solving > approach if I happen to dislike the changes your patches may cause in > the future. ;-) My patches are usually posted on list for a week or two before commit to the main tree. So if there's anything to dislike, you just need to post your objections, no reason to go through commit/revert churn. -- MST