From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Chris Webb" <chris@arachsys.com>,
Jernej@gnu.org, "Avi Kivity" <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Simončič <jernej's-kvm@eternallybored.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] High CPU use of -usbdevice tablet (was Re: KVM usability)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 22:53:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004042253.18066.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB8C51A.6070908@redhat.com>
> > My guess is that the overhead you're seeing is entirely from the USB host
> > adapter having to wake up and check the transport descriptor lists. This
> > will only result in the guest being woken if a device actually responds
> > (as mentioned above it should not).
>
> A quick profile on the host side doesn't show this. Instead, I see a
> lot of select() overhead.
This actually confirms my hypothesis. After fixing the UHCI bug the guest is
completely idle, but the host still needs to wake up at 1ms intervals to do
UHCI emulation. I can believe that the most visible part of this is the
select() syscall.
> Surprising as there are ~10 descriptors being
> polled, so ~1200 polls per second. Maybe epoll will help here.
I'm not sure where you get 1200 from. select will be called once per host
wakeup. i.e. if the USB controller is enabled then 1k times per second due to
the frame tick.
Are you sure there are actually 10 descriptors being polled? Remember that the
nfds argument is the value of the largest fd in the set (+1), not the number
of descriptors in the set.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-04 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1267068445.1726.25.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <1267089644.12790.74.camel@laptop>
[not found] ` <1267152599.1726.76.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <20100226090147.GH15885@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4B879A2F.50203@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20100226103545.GA7463@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4B87A6BF.3090301@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20100226111734.GE7463@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4B8813F2.8090208@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20100227105643.GA17425@elte.hu>
2010-02-27 13:30 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM usability Jan Kiszka
[not found] ` <d9c105ea1003011312s935c3c5haa1ec80aebe14d88@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4B8C38B8.8010007@codemonkey.ws>
[not found] ` <1267498953.2460.32.camel@x200>
[not found] ` <20100302082118.GT1924@arachsys.com>
[not found] ` <428008581.20100302103400@eternallybored.org>
[not found] ` <4B938F9D.7010207@redhat.com>
2010-04-04 12:31 ` [Qemu-devel] High CPU use of -usbdevice tablet (was Re: KVM usability) Chris Webb
2010-04-04 14:25 ` Paul Brook
2010-04-04 16:58 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-04 21:03 ` Paul Brook
2010-04-04 21:53 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2010-04-05 8:22 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004042253.18066.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=Jernej@gnu.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@arachsys.com \
--cc=jernej's-kvm@eternallybored.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).