From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O3yYR-0008Jq-DO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:30:55 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41403 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3yYN-0008JA-4b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:30:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3yY2-0001Ie-8Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:30:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3yY2-0001IK-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:30:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:26:27 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20100419212627.GB19464@redhat.com> References: <20100218222220.GA14847@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100218222220.GA14847@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: document block CMD and FLUSH List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Rusty Russell Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:22:20AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I took a stub at documenting CMD and FLUSH request types in virtio > block. Any comments?