From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6Kv6-0008Pv-CT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:48:04 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44024 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6Kv3-0008PJ-Sl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:48:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6Kv2-0004SS-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:48:01 -0400 Received: from mail.corp.accelance.fr ([213.162.48.15]:58727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6Kv2-0004Re-6x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:48:00 -0400 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-ppc: exception model of 603e inherits from 603 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:47:55 +0200 References: <1272015866-18544-1-git-send-email-thomas_ml@monjalon.net> <06CE1285-856D-449A-A296-66621006EA70@web.de> In-Reply-To: <06CE1285-856D-449A-A296-66621006EA70@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201004261147.55190.thomas_ml@monjalon.net> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?q?F=E4rber?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 23.04.2010 um 11:44 schrieb Thomas Monjalon: > > It appears that the exception handling of 603e is the same as 603. > > So it could be removed safely. > > Are you referring to some ppc manual or to the current code base? I'm referring to the current code base. I don't think there is a difference of exception handling between these two= =20 processors. So I think it's better to factorize the code and to refork it i= f=20 a difference is needed one day. But I think we need to minimize special=20 handling cases. =2D-=20 Thomas