From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6m0U-00085P-8b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:43:26 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44257 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6m0S-00084f-Nn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:43:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6m0Q-0001FI-Gp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:43:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6m0Q-0001Eu-8h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:43:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:42:44 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20100427144244.GB23249@amt.cnet> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 09/10] kvm: port qemu-kvm's bitmap scanning List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Yoshiaki Tamura Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:49:15PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > Hi, > > This patch may conflict with the patch I posted on April 19. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg29941.html > > If Marcelo's is going to be merged, I need to rebase the above to it. > It would be helpful if you could tell me the plan. > > Thanks, > > Yoshi Yoshi, Whatever gets in first, the other patch will have to rebased. I'm fine either way.