From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O9I4u-0003ep-7Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:22:24 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36218 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O9I4s-0003e7-Ns
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:22:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1O9I4q-0006v4-J9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:22:21 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:42668)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1O9I4q-0006ur-9E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:22:20 -0400
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] simple block driver cleanups
Message-ID: <20100504132218.GA12186@lst.de>
References: <20100504104351.GA6342@lst.de> <4BE0152F.3060109@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BE0152F.3060109@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 02:38:07PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.05.2010 12:43, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> > This series cleans up the simple read-only block drivers to use the
> > qemu block device API to access their backing devices, making the code
> > simpler and usable over nbd/curl.  I've not touched dmg yet as it's even
> > more bitrot than usual and deserves it's own series.
> 
> Have you already added something to qemu-iotests locally to test this or
> did you test manually?

I tested cloop manually, I haven't found usable creation tools for the
others yet.