From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1OAWZC-0002uq-20 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2010 19:02:46 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51982 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OAWZA-0002tC-VS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2010 19:02:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OAWZ9-0003zS-NV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2010 19:02:44 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:40416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OAWZ9-0003yB-IK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2010 19:02:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 00:02:34 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QLicense chaos Message-ID: <20100507230233.GA7836@shareable.org> References: <4BE46C8A.2010002@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BE46C8A.2010002@web.de> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , Luiz Capitulino Jan Kiszka wrote: > Moreover, some of the QObject files are LGPL, some GPL. I bet this was > also not intended. But what was the idea behind the LGPL? Some libqmp which > can be used by closed source apps? I believe LGPL is needed for source apps that have GPLv2-incompatible licensing. E.g. GPLv3, Apache license, OpenSSL? (I'm not sure exactly.) And for those who want to keep their own apps BSD-like. -- Jamie