From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1OBDnl-000784-Qq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 17:12:41 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55330 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OBDnj-00077D-6B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 17:12:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBDnh-0001Rv-Ih for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 17:12:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBDnh-0001Rf-BA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 17:12:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 00:08:36 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20100509210836.GD21338@redhat.com> References: <20100509161503.GA20492@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH master+0.12] pci: irq_state vmstate breakage List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 08:07:14PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > Code for saving irq_state got vm_state > > macros wrong, passing in the wrong parameter. > > As a result, we both saved a wrong value > > and restored it to a wrong offset. > > > > This leads to device and bus irq counts getting > > out of sync, which in turn leads to interrupts getting lost or > > never cleared, such as > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588133 > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > Acked-by: Juan Quintela > > Code is "obviously" wrong (TM). I didn't catch it when it was > introduced. How can it ever have worked since that commit? irq_state is often 0, that's why. > > --- > > > > Juan, could you please take a look at this patch? > > I managed to catch this bug by looking at > > a savevm image which already has a wrong value, > > but I could not reproduce it locally so I don't know > > for sure whether patch is enough, or there are other bugs. > > > > Anthony, this is a regression introduced in > > eea4acfa5c1ef26439a718375475fe468b7f2fba > > so we need the fix on 0.12 branch as well. > > > > hw/pci.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c > > index 95bfa3d..5452b86 100644 > > --- a/hw/pci.c > > +++ b/hw/pci.c > > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static VMStateInfo vmstate_info_pci_config = { > > > > static int get_pci_irq_state(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size) > > { > > - PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, config); > > + PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, irq_state); > > uint32_t irq_state[PCI_NUM_PINS]; > > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_PINS; ++i) { > > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int get_pci_irq_state(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size) > > static void put_pci_irq_state(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size) > > { > > int i; > > - PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, config); > > + PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, irq_state); > > > > for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_PINS; ++i) { > > qemu_put_be32(f, pci_irq_state(s, i));