From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59521 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCfun-0005gb-PS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:25:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sdb@zubnet.me.uk>) id 1OCfum-00028V-CH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:25:57 -0400
Received: from c.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([81.187.30.53]:40604)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sdb@zubnet.me.uk>) id 1OCful-000287-SB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:25:55 -0400
Received: from zubnet.me.uk ([81.187.243.246] helo=circe)
	by c.painless.aaisp.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sdb@zubnet.me.uk>) id 1OCfuj-0003DS-Tr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 22:25:53 +0100
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 22:24:10 +0100
From: Stuart Brady <sdb@zubnet.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Revive -version 'QEMU PC Emulator...'
Message-ID: <20100513212410.GA13302@zubnet.me.uk>
References: <1273696161-14332-1-git-send-email-crobinso@redhat.com>
	<4BEBF9A5.3070507@redhat.com> <20100513132102.GG12207@redhat.com>
	<201005131500.45447.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<AANLkTil9JQ-ah5PhpcwBqnCePhxatoebP-sAVbBBDVHj@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil9JQ-ah5PhpcwBqnCePhxatoebP-sAVbBBDVHj@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:20:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Fully agree.
> 
> I think even better line would be 'QEMU System Emulator..'.

Silly idea perhaps, but why not include the target name, e.g. 'QEMU i386
System Emulator'?  It only seems reasonable to me for the different
binaries to produce different output!

Cheers,
-- 
Stuart Brady