From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42751 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCvYR-00036T-Sq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:07:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1OCvYQ-0008Vc-F1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:07:55 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57335)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1OCvYQ-0008VX-7o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:07:54 -0400
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:07:47 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] New Monitor command: 'info netdevices'
Message-ID: <20100514110747.472be7d8@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikpTihEMCDrCQCLbcwKuuA0WNuCeeqs6T7vVMQH@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100513111809.551fdb12@redhat.com>
	<m3aas2ke8g.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<AANLkTikpTihEMCDrCQCLbcwKuuA0WNuCeeqs6T7vVMQH@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho <miguel.filho@gmail.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 14 May 2010 09:38:58 -0300
Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho <miguel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wr=
ote:
> >
> > There's also
> >
> > 3. Convert it anyway. =C2=A0Clean up the mess. =C2=A0Change the output.
> >
>=20
> I agree.
>=20
> It seams to me that no one is concerned with any Monitor output change
> with this particular command.
>=20
> Plus, no one have shown any concerns about the problems I've found in
> net/socket.c reported previously either.

 Sending patches increases the chances someone will look into it.