From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49828 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ODzY8-0005uH-T3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 08:36:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODzY7-0001yp-3U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 08:36:00 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:57090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODzY6-0001yX-RA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 08:35:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:35:54 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add QEMU DirectFB display driver Message-ID: <20100517123554.GA6558@lst.de> References: <1273856330-15161-1-git-send-email-julian.pidancet@citrix.com> <20100517114414.GA4776@lst.de> <4BF1330D.2010004@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF1330D.2010004@citrix.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Julian Pidancet Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 01:14:05PM +0100, Julian Pidancet wrote: > I have not heard about that, sorry. > My test configuration has an i915-like Intel graphic card, and a nearly standard 2.6.32 linux kernel. No specific patching was required. You're right. I've checked it and the horrible kernel code is entirely optional. Sorry for the noise.