From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34055 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEHrB-0007yJ-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 04:10:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEHpg-0005Vh-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 04:08:51 -0400 Received: from mtagate7.de.ibm.com ([195.212.17.167]:34509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEHpg-0005TP-80 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 04:07:20 -0400 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate7.de.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4I877Gn005883 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 08:07:07 GMT Received: from d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.229]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4I877C01659094 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:07:07 +0200 Received: from d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o4I876gN032641 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:07:07 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:07:06 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20100518080705.GA2467@stefan-thinkpad.transitives.com> References: <1273870057-4287-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <201005141730.57158.iggy@theiggy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005141730.57158.iggy@theiggy.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio_blk: Use blk-iopoll for host->guest notify List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Brian Jackson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 05:30:56PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: > Any preliminary numbers? latency, throughput, cpu use? What about comparing > different "weights"? I am running benchmarks and will report results when they are in. Stefan