From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49342 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OESpv-0003me-MY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 15:52:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OESov-0006kh-NT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 15:51:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OESot-0006kL-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 15:51:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:51:06 -0700 From: Chris Wright Message-ID: <20100518195106.GL21120@x200.localdomain> References: <20100518032346.GK4992@x200.localdomain> <201005180159.38787.iggy@theiggy.com> <4BF29BA4.50006@codemonkey.ws> <201005181446.16487.iggy@theiggy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005181446.16487.iggy@theiggy.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for May 18 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Brian Jackson Cc: Chris Wright , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org * Brian Jackson (iggy@theiggy.com) wrote: > On Tuesday 18 May 2010 08:52:36 Anthony Liguori wrote: > > On 05/18/2010 01:59 AM, Brian Jackson wrote: > > > On Monday 17 May 2010 22:23:46 Chris Wright wrote: > > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > >> > > >> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call. > > > > > > Perceived long standing bugs that nobody seems to care about. There are a > > > few, one of which is the> 1TB [1] bug that has existed for 4+ months. > > > > s/care about/know about/g > > > > This should be filed in launchpad as a qemu bug and it should be tested > > against the latest git. This bug sounds like we're using an int to > > represent sector offset somewhere but there's not enough info in the bug > > report to figure out for sure. I just audited the virtio-blk -> raw -> > > aio=threads path and I don't see an obvious place that we're getting it > > wrong. > > > > > And others. > > > > Bugs that affect qemu should be filed in launchpad. Launchpad has nice > > features like the able to mark bugs as affecting many users which help > > raise visibility. I can't speak for the source forge tracker, but I do > > regular triage on launchpad for qemu bugs. > > > I wonder how everyone would feel about closing the kvm tracker to new > submissions and move everything over to launchpad? Yeah, this was suggested on the call today. Anthony's sending out an email proposal on better bug tracking thanks, -chris