From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Bug Day - June 1st, 2010
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:52:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519115201.193e2efd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF316E3.6020002@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:38:27 -0500
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to improve the 0.13 release quality, I'd like to host a Bug
> Day on June 1st, 2010. I've setup a quick wiki page with some more info
> (http://wiki.qemu.org/BugDay/June2010).
Tuesday is our call conf day and other people have reported that they have
more confs during that day. Suggest Jun 2.
> Here's my basic thinking:
>
> - Anyone who can should try to spend some time either triaging bugs,
> updating bug status, or actually fixing bugs.
And testing, Fedora has a number of test cases already written, but
I guess that just a few are qemu specific:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-04-08_Virtualization
We could link those and write our own, or at least list the major
features to be tested..
Of course we could have a different day for testing too, but I think
this is a way to get everyone busy.
> - We'll have a special IRC channel (#qemu-bugday) on OFTC. As many
> QEMU and KVM developers as possible should join this channel for that
> day to help assist people working on bugs.
> - We'll try to migrate as many confirmable bugs from the Source Forge
> tracker to Launchpad.
Can't this be automated?
> If this is successful, we'll try to have regular bug days. Any
> suggestions on how to make the experience as fun and productive as
> possible are certainly appreciated!
Lots of foods and a Monty Python session in the evening.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-18 22:38 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Bug Day - June 1st, 2010 Anthony Liguori
2010-05-19 0:58 ` Natalia Portillo
2010-05-19 1:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-19 1:48 ` Natalia Portillo
2010-05-19 13:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-19 14:10 ` Natalia Portillo
2010-05-19 13:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-19 13:19 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-19 13:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-19 15:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-19 22:29 ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-19 22:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-20 5:58 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-20 7:15 ` Andre Przywara
2010-05-20 21:32 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-19 14:06 ` Natalia Portillo
2010-05-20 7:43 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-05-19 5:04 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-05-19 12:21 ` Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
2010-05-19 13:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-20 7:50 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-05-19 14:52 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2010-05-19 17:02 ` Anthony Liguori
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-19 14:17 Riccardo Magliocchetti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100519115201.193e2efd@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).